History
  • No items yet
midpage
Peter Mukuria v. Harold Clarke
706 F. App'x 139
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Peter K. Mukuria, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Hull Davidson, Assistant Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Peter K. Mukuria appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mukuria v. Clarke , No. 7:15-cv-00172-JPJ-RSB (W.D. Va. Sept. 27, 2016). We deny Mukuria’s motions to appoint counsel and to file an exhibit. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Peter Mukuria v. Harold Clarke
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Dec 19, 2017
Citation: 706 F. App'x 139
Docket Number: 16-7371
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.