Case Information
*1 16-2893-cv
Shetiwy v. Midland Credit Mgmt.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER Rulings by summary order do not have precedential effect. Citation to a summary order filed on or after January 1, 2007, is permitted and is governed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32.1 and this Court’s Local Rule 32.1.1. When citing a summary order in a document filed with this Court, a party must cite either the Federal Appendix or an electronic database (with the notation “summary order”). A party citing a summary order must serve a copy of it on any party not represented by counsel.
At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 15 th day of December, two thousand seventeen.
PRESENT: J OSÉ A. ABRANES
D EBRA A. IVINGSTON USAN L. ARNEY
Circuit Judges. MAL HETIWY , and other similarly situated, L OUIS C. Y EOSTROS , and other similarly situated, J OHN URPHY and other similarly situated, P LAMEN ANKOFT and other similarly situated, P ATRICIA R.
D IFFLEY PIROS RGYROS J OHANNA RBELAEZ ICHOLAS OUDALIS N ICOLE AGNON and other
similarly situated, S AFET K OLJENOVIC AGDI BDALLA HMED H ASSAN KATEREINE KOTEDIS
and other similarly situated, V IELKA V ARGAS and
other similarly situated, R OSE V ILLANEUVA and other
similarly situated,
Plaintiffs-Appellants 16-2893-cv v. IDLAND C REDIT M ANAGEMENT AKA M IDLAND
F UNDING LLC, C AVALRY P ORTFOLIO S ERVICES LLC, EBT O NE LLC, CACH, LLC, LVNV F UNDING
LLC, A SSET A CCEPTANCE LLC, FIA C ARD ERVICES
N.A., C HASE B ANK USA N.A., MERICAN E XPRESS
C OMPANY B ANK OF MERICA N.A., C APITAL O NE
F INANCIAL DVISORS LLC, ARS ATIONAL ERVICES I NC ., C ITI ROUP I NC ., C ITIBANK N.A., GE
C APITAL C ONSUMER ENDING I NC ., QUABLE SSENT F INANCIAL LLC, C APITAL O NE F INANCIAL ORPORATION C AVALRY SPV I, LLC, P ORTFOLIO
R ECOVERY SSOCIATES LLC, AKA ORTFOLIO
R ECOVERY
Defendants-Appellees
NCO F INANCIAL YSTEMS I NCORPORATED APITAL ANAGEMENT ERVICES
Defendants . [*] FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS: Phillip Jaffe, New York, NY.
FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES Midland
Credit Management, AKA Midland Funding, LLC
and Asset Acceptance LLC: Casey D. Laffey and Nana Japaridze, Reed
Smith LLP, New York, NY.
FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES Cavalry
Portfolio Services LLC, Equable Assent
Financial, LLC, and Cavalry SPV I, LLC: Donald S. Maurice, Jr., Maurice &
Wutscher, LLP, Flemington, NJ. *3 FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLEE DebtOne,
LLC: William Raley Alford, III, Stanley, Reuter,
Ross, Thornton & Alford, L.L.C., New Orleans, LA.
FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLEE CACH, LLC: Manuel H. Newburger, Barron &
Newburger, P.C., Austin, TX, and Jonathan J. Greystone, Spector Gadon & Rosen, P.C., Philadelphia, PA.
FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLEE LVNV
Funding, LLC: Concepcion A. Montoya and Kyle M.
Medley, Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, New York, NY.
FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES FIA Card
Services, N.A. and Bank of America, N.A.: S. Elaine McChesney and Peter C. Neger,
Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP, New York, NY.
FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLEE Chase Bank
USA N.A.: Andrew A. Ruffino, Covington & Burling
LLP, New York, NY, and Robert D. Wick and Henry B. Liu, Covington & Burling LLP, Washington, DC.
FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLEE American
Express Company: Carmine D. Boccuzzi, Jr., Cleary Gottlieb
Steen & Hamilton LLP, New York, NY.
FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLEES Capital One
Financial Advisors, LLC and Capital One
Financial Corporation: David John Fioccola and Jessica
Kaufman, Morrison & Foerster LLP, New FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLEE ARS National
Services Inc.: Richard J. Perr, Fineman Krekstein &
Harris, Philadelphia, PA.
FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLEES CitiGroup Inc.
and Citibank, N.A.: Stephen C. Robinson, Skadden, Arps,
Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, New York, NY.
FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLEE GE Capital
Consumer Lending, Inc.: Michael D. Hynes, DLA Piper LLP, New FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLEE Portfolio
Recovery Associates, LLC, AKA Portfolio
Recovery: Oren D. Langer, Robins, Kaplan L.L.P.,
New York, NY. Appeal from a July 25, 2016 order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Richard J. Sullivan, Judge ).
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the order be and hereby is AFFIRMED .
Plaintiff-Appellants (“Plaintiffs”) appeal the District Court’s order of dismissal with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16(f) and 41(b).
In this case, Plaintiffs make no arguments concerning the District Court’s final order in their principal brief. An appellant is deemed to have waived arguable claims on an issue that is not argued in his or her principal brief. See, e.g. Gross v. Rell , 585 F.3d 72, 95 (2d Cir. 2009). Accordingly, the District Court’s order of July 25, 2016 is affirmed.
CONCLUSION
We AFFIRM the District Court’s order of July 25, 2016.
FOR THE COURT: Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk
[*] The Clerk of the Court is hereby directed to amend the caption as shown above.