History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bradley Willis v. Anne Arundel County
706 F. App'x 116
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before KEENAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joyce E. Smithey, Reuben W. Wolfson, RIFKIN WEINER LIVINGSTON LLC, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellant. Nancy McCutchan Duden, County Attorney, Kelly C. Lovett, Senior Assistant County Attorney, ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY OFFICE OF LAW, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bradley Willis appeals the district court’s order granting Anne Arundel County, Maryland, summary judgment on his discriminatory discipline claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2012 & Supp. 2017); Md. Code Ann., State Gov’t Title 20 (West 2017); Md. Const. Decl. of Rights, art. 24; and the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Willis v. Anne Arundel Cty., Md. , No. 1:16-cv- 01388-JKB (D. Md. March 10, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Bradley Willis v. Anne Arundel County
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Dec 13, 2017
Citation: 706 F. App'x 116
Docket Number: 17-1438
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.