History
  • No items yet
midpage
Catherine Hill v. Lvmpd
16-16260
| 9th Cir. | Dec 5, 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before: WALLACE, CALLAHAN, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Catherine Hill appeals from the district court’s summary judgment in favor of the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department in this action brought under 42 *2 U.S.C. § 1983 and Nevada state law. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

AFFIRMED

2

[*] This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

[**] The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Case Details

Case Name: Catherine Hill v. Lvmpd
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Dec 5, 2017
Docket Number: 16-16260
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.