History
  • No items yet
midpage
Adrienne McAdory v. Vail Technologies
705 F. App'x 191
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before KEENAN, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Adrienne L. McAdory, Appellant Pro Se. Craig Benson Young, KUTAK ROCK, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Adrienne L. McAdory appeals the district court’s order granting Vail Technologies’ bill of costs. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McAdory v. Vail Technologies , No. 1:16-cv-00886-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. June 13, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Adrienne McAdory v. Vail Technologies
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Dec 6, 2017
Citation: 705 F. App'x 191
Docket Number: 17-1725
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.