History
  • No items yet
midpage
Waneley Brown v. United States
705 F. App'x 196
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Waneley Wray Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Waneley Wray Brown appeals the district court’s order and judgment denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. United States , No. 1:17-cv-00017-MR (W.D.N.C. June 19, 2017). We grant Brown leave to proceed in forma pauperis and his motion to supplement his informal brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Waneley Brown v. United States
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Dec 6, 2017
Citation: 705 F. App'x 196
Docket Number: 17-6821
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.