History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Dale Aldridge
704 F. App'x 611
| 8th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Dale Aldridge appeals from the order of the District Court denying his motion [1] for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Following de novo review, *2 we agree with the District Court that Aldridge was ineligible for the requested sentence reduction based on an amendment to the United States Sentencing Guidelines because his original sentence was derived from the applicable statutory minimum. See United States v. Moore, 734 F.3d 836, 837–38 (8th Cir. 2013). We decline to address Aldridge’s additional pro se arguments, which are raised for the first time on appeal and are unrelated to his sentence-reduction motion. We affirm the judgment and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________

-2-

[1] The Honorable James E. Gritzner, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Dale Aldridge
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Date Published: Dec 5, 2017
Citation: 704 F. App'x 611
Docket Number: 17-1997
Court Abbreviation: 8th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.