*1 Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: ^[*]

The attorney appointed to represent Arturo Gonzalez-Perez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief and a supplemental brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gonzalez-Perez has filed a response. The motion for appointment of substitute counsel is DENIED as untimely. See United States v. Wagner , 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998).

*2 Case: 16-41189 Document: 00514256554 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/01/2017

No. 16-41189

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Gonzalez-Perez’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.

2

[*] Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.