History
  • No items yet
midpage
Momolu Sirleaf v. Eddie Pearson
704 F. App'x 269
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Momolu V.S. Sirleaf, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Priest Momolu V.S. Sirleaf, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition without prejudice for his failure to comply with the magistrate judge’s directives. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order that Sirleaf seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny the motion for abatement, and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Momolu Sirleaf v. Eddie Pearson
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Nov 28, 2017
Citation: 704 F. App'x 269
Docket Number: 17-6798
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.