History
  • No items yet
midpage
in Re: Toyota Motor Corporation and Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A, Inc.
05-17-01293-CV
| Tex. App. | Nov 21, 2017
|
Check Treatment

*1 Denied and Opinion Filed November 21, 2017

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-01293-CV IN RE TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION AND TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A, INC., Relators Original Proceeding from the 134th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-16-15296 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang-Miers, Myers, and Boatright

Opinion by Justice Lang-Miers In this original proceeding, relators seek relief from the trial court’s November 2, 2017 order compelling relators to respond to certain discovery requests. To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co. , 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, we conclude relators have not established that the trial court clearly abused its discretion. Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 52.8(a) (the court must deny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to the relief sought).

/Elizabeth Lang-Miers/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS JUSTICE 171293F.P05

Case Details

Case Name: in Re: Toyota Motor Corporation and Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A, Inc.
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Nov 21, 2017
Docket Number: 05-17-01293-CV
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.