*1 Before STEWART, Chief Judge, and OWEN and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: ^[*]

Juan Ismael Orozco-Vazquez appeals his conditional guilty plea conviction of conspiring to possess with intent to distribute cocaine for which he was sentenced to 27 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release.

In reviewing a district court’s suppression ruling, we review factual findings for clear error and questions of law de novo. United States v. Jaime , *2 Case: 16-41546 Document: 00514246822 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/22/2017

No. 16-41546

473 F.3d 178, 181 (5th Cir. 2006). A factual finding is not clearly erroneous so long as it is plausible in light of the record as a whole. United States v. McKinnon , 681 F.3d 203, 207 (5th Cir. 2012). Facts are construed in the light most favorable to the Government as the prevailing party on the motion to suppress. United States v. Macias , 658 F.3d 509, 517 (5th Cir. 2011).

The district court did not clearly err in denying Orozco-Vazquez’s motion to suppress. See Jaime , 473 F.3d at 181. Orozco-Vazquez’s detention in the primary inspection lane was within the permissible duration of an immigration checkpoint stop. See United States v. Machuca-Barrera , 261 F.3d 425, 431-35 (5th Cir. 2001).

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

2

[*] Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.