History
  • No items yet
midpage
Alejandro Muniz-Orosco v. Jefferson Sessions
702 F. App'x 658
| 9th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before: CANBY, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

Alejandro Muniz-Orosco, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying cancellation of removal and denying a motion to continue. We dismiss the petition for review.

*2 We lack jurisdiction to consider Muniz-Orosco’s unexhausted contention that his conviction under Cal. Penal Code § 273.5 is not a domestic violence conviction. See Tijani v. Holder , 628 F.3d 1071, 1080 (9th Cir. 2010) (“We lack jurisdiction to review legal claims not presented in an alien’s administrative proceeding before the [agency].”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

2 15-70937

[*] This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

[**] The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Case Details

Case Name: Alejandro Muniz-Orosco v. Jefferson Sessions
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Nov 20, 2017
Citation: 702 F. App'x 658
Docket Number: 15-70937
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.