*1 Before: CANBY, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

Jennafer Yellowhorse appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing for failure to state a claim her action alleging various federal claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Barren v. Harrington , 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 *2 (9th Cir. 1998) (order). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Yellowhorse’s action because Yellowhorse failed to allege facts sufficient to state any plausible claims. See Ashcroft v. Iqbal , 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (“[A] complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)).

AFFIRMED.

2 17-15688

[*] This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

[**] The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).