*1 Before: FARRIS, CANBY, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Leonel Marin-Torres appeals from the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 motion to reduce his sentence. Pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Marin-Torres’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We *2 have provided Marin-Torres the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to reduce Marin- Torres’s sentence because of his extensive record of violence before and after his sentence was imposed. In addition, our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED .

AFFIRMED .

2

[*] This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. * * The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).