History
  • No items yet
midpage
Com. v. Karash, F.
263 WDA 2017
| Pa. Super. Ct. | Nov 16, 2017
|
Check Treatment

*1 J-A18008-17

2017 PA Super 365 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

: PENNSYLVANIA : v. :

: : FREDERICK W. KARASH :

: Appellant : No. 263 WDA 2017 Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence January 24, 2017 In the Court of Common Pleas of Erie County Criminal Division at No(s):

CP-25-SA-0000161-2016 BEFORE: BOWES, J., LAZARUS, J., and OTT, J.

CONCURRING STATEMENT BY OTT, J.: FILED NOVEMBER 16, 2017

I am constrained to agree with the Majority that the decision in Banellis is controlling, and accordingly, we must reverse the appellant’s judgment of sentence.

Nevertheless, I agree with the comment of the Williams Court that this interpretation of the statute will lead to an “absurd result.” Williams , supra , 872 A.2d at 189. Indeed, I find it difficult to believe the legislature, when enacting this statute, intended to require the Commonwealth to prove a negative in every prosecution under this section.

Judge Lazarus joins the concurring statement.

Case Details

Case Name: Com. v. Karash, F.
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Nov 16, 2017
Docket Number: 263 WDA 2017
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.