*1 Before: LEAVY, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Gabriel Armendariz appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging false arrest. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

*2 Because Armendariz failed to raise any arguments regarding the basis for the district court’s grant of summary judgment, he has waived any such challenge on appeal. See Smith v. Marsh , 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999) (“[O]n appeal, arguments not raised by a party in its opening brief are deemed waived.”); Greenwood v. FAA , 28 F.3d 971, 977 (9th Cir. 1994) (“We will not manufacture arguments for an appellant . . . .”).

We do not consider arguments or allegations raised for the first time on appeal. See Smith , 194 F.3d at 1052 (“As a general rule, we will not consider arguments that are raised for the first time on appeal.”).

AFFIRMED.

2 17-15752

[*] This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

[**] The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).