*1 Before: McKEOWN, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Jermaine D. Henderson appeals from the revocation of supervised release and the 36-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Henderson’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of *2 record. We have provided Henderson the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the revocation and sentence.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

2 16-30119

[*] This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

[**] The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).