*1 Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Davis Thomas pled guilty to sexual abuse of a child under the age of sixteen years. Idaho Code § 18-1506(1)(a). The district court sentenced Thomas to a unified term of six years with two years determinate. Thomas appeals asserting that the district court abused its discretion by imposing an excessive sentence. ^[1]

*2 Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho 722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Thomas’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.

2

[1] Thomas also filed an Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion for reduction of sentence which the district court denied. Thomas does not appeal from the denial of the motion. 1