*1 Before KING, OWEN, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: ^[*]

The attorney appointed to represent Fernando Arturo Flores-Fang has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Flores-Fang has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with *2 Case: 16-41688 Document: 00514207233 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/24/2017

No. 16-41688

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.

2

[*] Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.