History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hill v. Executive Office for United States Attorneys
699 F. App'x 188
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brian David Hill, Appellant Pro Se. Cheryl Thornton Sloan, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Brian David Hill seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order denying his discovery-related motions and granting Defendants’ motion to quash discovery in his pending Freedom of Information Act action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Hill seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Hill v. Executive Office for United States Attorneys
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Oct 19, 2017
Citation: 699 F. App'x 188
Docket Number: 17-1866
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.