History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re: Sandra Elliott v.
699 F. App'x 187
4th Cir.
2017
Check Treatment
Docket

*1 Before FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sandra Elliott, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sandra Elliott petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on her motion seeking to dismiss the criminal information and all related petitions and pleadings, to withdraw her plea agreement, and for return of property. She seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court has now dismissed the motion. Accordingly, because the district court has recently ruled on Elliott’s motion, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

2

Case Details

Case Name: In re: Sandra Elliott v.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Oct 19, 2017
Citation: 699 F. App'x 187
Docket Number: 17-1761
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.