History
  • No items yet
midpage
Montanore Minerals Corp. v. Arnold Bakie
15-35707
| 9th Cir. | Oct 18, 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 JR., and MORGAN CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The opinion, filed on August 16, 2017, is amended as follows: On page 15, line 13, a footnote is added following <§ 70-30-304(1),> which reads: <Unless a jury is expressly waived, MCA Section 70-30-304(1) provides that appeals from the compensation decision in this type of action shall be heard by a jury. The district court acknowledged this provision, but ruled: “Regardless of whether the Defendants choose to appeal this order and seek a trial by jury, the Court has concluded that judgment should be entered in favor of Montanore at this time, thereby obviating the need for a jury trial in this Court.”>.

With the foregoing amendment, Appellee and Cross- Appellant Montanore Minerals Corporations’s petition for panel rehearing, filed August 30, 2017, is DENIED. Judge M. Smith and Judge Christen vote to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge D.W. Nelson so recommends. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petition for rehearing en banc, filed the same date, is DENIED. No future petitions shall be entertained.

Case Details

Case Name: Montanore Minerals Corp. v. Arnold Bakie
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Oct 18, 2017
Docket Number: 15-35707
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.