Case Information
*1 OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ CREATIVE TECHNOLOGY LTD., CREATIVE LABS,
INC., Appellants v.
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee GOOGLE LLC, MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC, LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC., LENOVO GROUP LTD., BLACKBERRY LTD., BLACKBERRY
CORPORATION, HTC CORPORATION, HTC AMERICA, INC., LG ELECTRONICS, INC., LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC., LG ELECTRONICS MOBILECOMM U.S.A., INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SONY CORPORATION, SONY MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS INC., SONY MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS AB, SONY MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS (USA) INC., ZTE CORPORATION, ZTE (USA) INC., Intervenors 2016-2715 *2 Appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-994.
JUDGMENT ONATHAN D ANIEL B AKER , Farney Daniels PC, San Mateo, CA, argued for appellants. Also represented by M ICHAEL D. S AUNDERS URTEJ S INGH .
H OUDA M ORAD , Office of the General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by W AYNE W. ERRINGTON IDNEY A. OSENZWEIG D OMINIC L.
B IANCHI .
D AN AGATELL , Perkins Coie LLP, Hanover, NH, argued for all intervenors. Intervenors Google LLC, and Motorola Mobility LLC, Lenovo (United States) Inc., Lenovo Group Ltd., Blackberry Ltd., and Blackberry Corporation also represented by V ERONICA USANA SCARRUNZ , Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati, PC, Washington, DC. Intervenors Blackberry Ltd. and Black- berry Corporation also represented by D ANIEL P. M UINO , Morrison & Foerster LLP, Washington, DC; V INCENT ELUSKO , Los Angeles, CA. F RED W ILLIAMS , Vinson & Elkins LLP, Austin, TX, for intervenors HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc.
Also represented by J ONATHAN L LOYD ARDT .
S NDREW E LENGOLD , Fish & Richardson, PC, Washington, DC, for intervenors LG Electronics, Inc., LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., and LG Electronics Mobilecomm U.S.A., Inc. Also represented by C HRISTIAN HU ICHAEL M K EON .
3 R ICHARD R AINEY , Covington & Burling LLP, Wash- ington, DC, for intervenors Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. Also represented by A LEXANDER C HINOY ; G REGORY IEBERG , New York, NY; A LICE J UWON A HN , San Francisco, CA.
M ICHAEL N. R ADER , Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, PC, Boston, MA, for intervenors Sony Corporation, Sony Mobile Communications Inc., Sony Mobile Communica- tions AB, and Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc.
Also represented by C HRISTOPHER H ENRY , G ERALD B. RYCYSZYN ; AMES LTMAN , ARBARA URPHY , Foster,
Murphy, Altman & Nickel, PC, Washington, DC.
L YLE RENT V ANDER CHAAF , Brinks Gilson & Lione, Washington, DC, for intervenors ZTE Corporation and ZTE (USA) Inc. Also represented by J EFFREY C ATALANO ALPH ABRIC , Chicago, IL.
T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is O RDERED and DJUDGED :
P ER URIAM (N EWMAN UGHES and S TOLL Circuit Judges ).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE OURT October 13, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court
