*1 N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit R+L CARRIERS, INC., v.

MICRODEA, INC., PEOPLENET COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, DRIVERTECH LLC, INTERMEC TECHNOLOGIES

CORP., Defendants-Appellees PEOPLENET COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellee v.

R+L CARRIERS, INC., Defendant-Appellant ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DRIVERTECH LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee Defendant-Appellant *2 INTERMEC TECHNOLOGIES CORP., Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2016-2688, 2016-2689, 2016-2690, 2016-2692 ______________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in Nos. 1:09-cv-00179-SSB, 1:09-cv-00472-SSB, 1:09-cv-00502-SSB, 1:09-cv-00532- SSB, 1:09-md-02050-SSB-SKB, Senior Judge Sandra S. Beckwith.

______________________ JUDGMENT NTHONY C. W HITE , Thompson Hine LLP, Columbus, OH, argued for appellant. Also represented by P HILIP B S INENENG ; S TEPHEN B UTLER S R ., Cincinnati, OH; A RTHUR L ICYGIEWICZ Cleveland, OH.

J ONATHAN S. F RANKLIN , Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP, Washington, DC, argued for all appellees. Appellees Microdea, Inc., Peoplenet Communications Corporation also represented by J AMES G EORGE W ARRINER , Austin, TX; R ICHARD S TEPHEN Z EMBEK , Houston, TX.

S COTT M. P ETERSON , Fabian VanCott, Salt Lake City, UT, for appellee Drivertech LLC. Also represented by P HILIP D ANIEL D RACHT .

3 C ARSON V EACH , Freeborn & Peters, LLP, Chicago, IL, for appellee Intermec Technologies Corp.

T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is O RDERED and DJUDGED :