Tao Zha and Suzanne Zha filed a quiet title action against Mark G. Sayeg and Edie G. Sayeg. Donna R. Whitener was subsequently added as a defendant. The Zhas requested that the quiet title dispute be submitted to a special master, which issued a report finding in favor of the Zhas. The report was adopted by the trial court as its final order, and the defendants seek to appeal this ruling. The Zhas have filed a motion to dismiss, asserting that the case is not ripe for appellate review as claims remain pending below.

As a general rule, a right of direct appeal lies from a final judgment; that is, where the case is no longer pending below. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (1). If a trial court’s order adjudicates fewer than all of the claims asserted, the order is non-final. See Johnson v. Hosp. Corp. of America , 192 Ga. App. 628, 629 (385 SE2d 731) (1989). “In such circumstances, there must be an express determination under OCGA § 9-11-54 (b) or there must be compliance with the interlocutory appeal requirements of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). Where neither of these code sections are followed, the appeal is premature and must be dismissed.” Id. (punctuation omitted).

Here, the Zhas amended their complaint to include additional claims for trespass, injunctive relief and punitive damages. Because the trial court has not decided those claims – and because it does not appear that the Zhas have abandoned or waived those claims – the trial court’s order is non-final. See Rhymes v. East Atlanta Church of God , 284 Ga. 145, 147-148 (663 SE2d 670) (2008). Accordingly, *2 the motion to dismiss is hereby GRANTED, and this appeal is DISMISSED as premature.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 10/05/2017 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk.