Before: *1 KOZINSKI FRIEDLAND and , Circuit Judges, and ARTERTON , ^[**]

District Judge. *2 page 2 1. The district court didn’t err by finding that Woods failed to show

“imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). This case is unlike Williams v. Paramo, where the prisoner alleged actual threats of violence. See 775 F.3d 1182, 1190 (9th Cir. 2015).

2. We grant Woods’s first three motions for judicial notice and deny his

fourth motion for judicial notice. Fed. R. Evid. 201(b).

AFFIRMED .

[*] This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. * * The Honorable Janet Bond Arterton, United States District Judge for the District of Connecticut, sitting by designation.