History
  • No items yet
midpage
Shan Carter v. John Sherrill
698 F. App'x 111
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shan Edward Carter, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Shan Edward Carter appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012) and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Carter v. Sherill , No. 5:16-ct-03272-D (E.D.N.C. June 13 & July 17, 2017). We also deny Carter’s motion to assign counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Shan Carter v. John Sherrill
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Oct 3, 2017
Citation: 698 F. App'x 111
Docket Number: 17-6907
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.