History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Elizabeth Rushing
698 F. App'x 103
4th Cir.
2017
Check Treatment
Docket

*1 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Elizabeth Marie Rushing-Floyd, Appellant Pro Se. Gill Paul Beck, Sr., Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina; William A. Brafford, Jonathan Henry Ferry, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Tiffany Mallory Moore, Jennifer A. Youngs, Assistant United States Attorneys, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Elizabeth Rushing appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for modification of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Rushing , No. 3:00-cr-00008-FDW-7 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 21, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Elizabeth Rushing
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Oct 3, 2017
Citation: 698 F. App'x 103
Docket Number: 17-6666
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.