History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Alberto Herrera-Arteaga
16-10493
| 9th Cir. | Oct 2, 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before: SILVERMAN, TALLMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

In these consolidated appeals, Alberto Herrera-Arteaga appeals his guilty- plea conviction and 51-month sentence for reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, and the revocation of supervised release and concurrent 18- *2 month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Herrera-Arteaga’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Herrera-Arteaga the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on these direct appeals.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

2 16-10493 & 16-10494

[*] This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

[**] The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Alberto Herrera-Arteaga
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Oct 2, 2017
Docket Number: 16-10493
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.