*1 Before: SILVERMAN, TALLMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Jesus Acevedo-Landin appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 24-month sentence for attempted reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Acevedo-Landin’s counsel has filed a brief *2 stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Acevedo-Landin the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

2 16-50437

[*] This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

[**] The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).