History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re: Travis Arnold v.
698 F. App'x 75
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Travis Denorris Arnold, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Travis Denorris Arnold petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court dismissed the motion on June 23, 2017 . Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Arnold’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We deny Arnold’s motion to suspend appellate proceedings. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

2

Case Details

Case Name: In re: Travis Arnold v.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Oct 2, 2017
Citation: 698 F. App'x 75
Docket Number: 17-1543
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.