History
  • No items yet
midpage
Randall Patrick v. Citibank, N.A.
698 F. App'x 78
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randall Patrick, Appellant Pro Se. Cassandra Lauren Crawford, Donald Richard Pocock, NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, LLP, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Randall Patrick seeks to appeal from the district court’s order denying his motion to remand the case to the state court, denying as moot his motion to expedite a decision on his motion to remand, and granting Citibank’s motion to stay the action and to compel arbitration. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Patrick seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Randall Patrick v. Citibank, N.A.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Oct 2, 2017
Citation: 698 F. App'x 78
Docket Number: 17-1663
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.