History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dermetric Pearson v. Cropp-Metcalfe, Inc.
698 F. App'x 73
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before WILKINSON and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dermetric Pearson, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Lee Isler, Lori Hunt Turner, ISLER DARE, PC, Vienna, Virginia; Frank Leo Kollman, KOLLMAN & SAUCIER, PA, Timonium, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dermetric Pearson appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendant’s motion to dismiss his amended civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Pearson v. Cropp-Metcalfe, Inc. , No. 1:16-cv-01615-CMH-MSN (E.D. Va. filed May 5, 2017; entered May 9, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Dermetric Pearson v. Cropp-Metcalfe, Inc.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Sep 29, 2017
Citation: 698 F. App'x 73
Docket Number: 17-1628
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.