History
  • No items yet
midpage
Womens Services v. Paul Douglas
710 F.2d 465
| 8th Cir. | 1983
|
Check Treatment

710 F.2d 465

WOMENS SERVICES, P.C., a Nebraska Professional Corporation;
G. William Orr, M.D. and Raymond L. Schulte, M.D., Appellees,
v.
Paul L. DOUGLAS, Attorney General for the State of Nebraska
and Donald L. Knowles, County Attorney for the
County of Douglas, State of Nebraska,
Appellants.
Raymond L. SCHULTE, M.D., Appellee,
v.
Paul L. DOUGLAS, Attorney General for the State of Nebraska
and Donald L. Knowles, County Attorney for the
County of Douglas, State of Nebraska,
Appellants.
Marvin L. DIETRICH, M.D., Appellee,
v.
Paul L. DOUGLAS, Attorney General of the State of Nebraska
and Donald L. Knowles, County Attorney for the
County of Douglas, Nebraska, Appellants.

No. 82-2292.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Submitted May 19, 1983.
Decided June 28, 1983.

Frank Susman, Roselee Adlin, Susman, Schermer, Rimmel & Parker, St. Louis, Mo., Lawrence I. Batt, Garber & Batt, Michael T. Levy, Levy & Lazer, P.C., Omaha, Neb., for appellees.

Robert C. Sigler, Omaha, Neb., for appellants.

Before ROSS, ARNOLD and JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

Womens Services filed this action on March 30, 1981, challenging the constitutionality of certain sections of the Nebraska criminal code regulating abortion. Neb.Rev.Stat. Secs. 28-326(6), 329, 330 and 331 (1981). The district court1 originally dismissed the case on abstention grounds on March 26, 1981. This court reversed and remanded for trial. Womens Services P.C. v. Douglas, 653 F.2d 355 (8th Cir.1981).

2

On July 30, 1981, the district court ruled that the above-cited sections were facially unconstitutional. The court awarded plaintiffs attorney fees totalling $29,936.10. Defendants appeal the judgment of the district court finding the statutes unconstitutional and also appeal the award of attorney fees.

3

Upon a careful review of the record and briefs of the parties in this case we conclude that the judgment of the district court is based on findings of fact which are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. Further, we find no abuse of discretion in the award of attorney fees. Accordingly, we affirm on the basis of Judge Urbom's memoranda and order. See 8th Cir. R. 14.

1

The Honorable Warren K. Urbom, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska

Case Details

Case Name: Womens Services v. Paul Douglas
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Date Published: Jun 28, 1983
Citation: 710 F.2d 465
Docket Number: 82-2292
Court Abbreviation: 8th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.