History
  • No items yet
midpage
Directv, Inc., etc. v. State of Florida, Dept. of Revenue
14-0292
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Sep 26, 2017
|
Check Treatment
Case Information

*1 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA DIRECTV, INC., N/K/A

DIRECTV, LLC, AND

ECHOSTAR SATELLITE,

L.L.C., N/K/A DISH

NETWORK, L.L.C.,

Appellants, v. CASE NOS. 1D13-5444 & 1D14-0292 STATE OF FLORIDA,

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,

MARCUS AND PATRICIA

OGBORN, ON BEHALF OF

THEMSELVES AND OTHERS

SIMILARLY SITUATED, JIM

ZINGALE, ACTING IN HIS

OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS THE

DIRECTOR OF THE FLORIDA

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE ,

AND FLORIDA CABLE

TELECOMMUNICATIONS

ASSOCIATION,

Appellees.

_____________________________/

Opinion filed September 20, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Terry P. Lewis, Judge.

Katherine E. Giddings and Kristen M. Fiore of Akerman LLP, Tallahassee; Peter O. Larsen, Timothy J. McDermott, and Aleksas A. Barauskas of Akerman LLP, Jacksonville; E. Joshua Rosenkranz and Jeremy N. Kudon of Orrick, Herrington & *2 Sutcliffe LLC, New York, N.Y., pro hac vice; and Eric A. Shumsky of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLC, Washington, D.C., pro hac vice, for Appellants. Christine Davis Graves of Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A., Tallahassee; John A. Hinman of Hinman & Carmichael, San Francisco, CA, pro hac vice, for Amicus Curiae National Association of Wine Retailers.

Joseph C. Mellichamp, III, and J. Clifton Cox, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Appellee State of Florida.

Amelia T. Rudolph, Eric S. Tresh, and Zachary T. Atkins of Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP, Atlanta, GA, pro hac vice; David Konuch, Tallahassee, for Appellee Florida Cable Telecommunications Association.

ON REMAND FROM THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT

PER CURIAM.

We originally reversed the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the appellee, finding that the sales tax portion of the Communications Services Tax Simplification Law violated the Commerce Clause in Directv, Inc. v. Florida Department of Revenue, 218 So. 3d 895 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) (Directv I). Thereafter, the Florida Supreme Court reversed our opinion and found that section 202.12(1), Florida Statutes, did not violate the Commerce Clause in Florida Department of Revenue v. Directv, Inc., 215 So. 3d 43 (Fla. 2017) (Directv II). *3 Applying Directv II, we find that the trial court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of appellees and ordering the appellants to pay costs.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, JAY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.

Case Details

Case Name: Directv, Inc., etc. v. State of Florida, Dept. of Revenue
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Sep 26, 2017
Docket Number: 14-0292
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.