*1 Before REAVLEY, PRADO, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: ^[*]

The attorney appointed to represent Jaron Quinn Dailey has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed an initial brief and a supplemental brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Dailey has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Dailey’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment *2 Case: 16-51021 Document: 00514159076 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/15/2017

No. 16-51021

that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.

2

[*] Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.