History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wims v. Warden, FCI Edgefield
697 F. App'x 206
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before AGEE, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy Wims, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Timothy Wims, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm. See Beckles v. United States , 137 S. Ct. 886, 894-95 (2017) (United States Sentencing Guidelines not subject to void for vagueness challenge and therefore Johnson v. United States , 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015), did not invalidate the residual clause of the definition of a crime of violence under the Guidelines). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Wims v. Warden, FCI Edgefield
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Sep 15, 2017
Citation: 697 F. App'x 206
Docket Number: 17-6224
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.