History
  • No items yet
midpage
In Re: Radcliffe
17-1069
| Fed. Cir. | Sep 8, 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IN RE: WILLIAM H. RADCLIFFE, Appellant ______________________ 2017-1069 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 12/804,454.

______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ M ATHEW P ERRONE , J R ., Law Office of Mathew R. P. Perrone, Jr., Algonquin, IL, argued for appellant. A MY J. N ELSON , Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Joseph Matal. Also represented by N ATHAN K. K ELLEY , T HOMAS W. K RAUSE , J EREMIAH H ELM .

______________________

T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (M OORE , C HEN , and H UGHES , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT September 8, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case Details

Case Name: In Re: Radcliffe
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Date Published: Sep 8, 2017
Docket Number: 17-1069
Court Abbreviation: Fed. Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.