History
  • No items yet
midpage
Nantkwest, Inc. v. Matal
869 F.3d 1327
| Fed. Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket
Case Information

*1 Before P ROST , Chief Judge , N EWMAN , L OURIE , YK , OORE O’M ALLEY , EYNA , W ALLACH , ARANTO , H UGHES , and S TOLL , Circuit Judges .

P ER URIAM . [*] N I O E R

This case was argued before a panel of three judges on February 9, 2017. A sua sponte request for a poll on whether to reconsider this case was made. A poll was conducted and a majority of the judges who are in regular active service voted for sua sponte en banc consideration.

Accordingly, T I S O RDERED HAT : The panel opinion of June 23, 2017 is vacated,

and the appeal is reinstated. This case will be heard en banc sua sponte under

28 U.S.C. § 46 and Federal Rule of Appellate Proce- dure 35(a). The court en banc shall consist of all circuit judges in regular active service who are not recused or disqualified. The parties are requested to file new briefs. The

briefs should address the following issue:

Did the panel in NantKwest, Inc. v. Matal , 860 F.3d 1352 (Fed. Cir. 2017) correctly determine that 35 U.S.C. § 145’s “[a]ll the expenses of the proceedings” provision authorizes an award of the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s at- torneys’ fees? An original and thirty copies of the new en banc

briefs shall be filed, and two copies of each en banc brief shall be served on opposing counsel. Appellant’s en banc brief is due 45 days from the date of this order. Appellee’s en banc response brief is due within 30 days of service of appellant’s en banc brief, and the reply brief within 15 days of service of the response brief. Briefs shall adhere to the type-volume limitations set forth in Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32 and Federal Circuit Rule 32.

N

(5) Briefing should be strictly limited to the issue set forth above. In addition, the parties are directed to file with

the court thirty paper copies of their original briefs and any appendix within 17 days from the date of this Order. Briefs of amici curiae will be entertained, and

any such amicus briefs may be filed without consent and leave of court but otherwise must comply with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 29 and Federal Circuit Rule 29. This appeal will be heard en banc on the basis of

the original briefs, the supplemental briefs ordered here- in, and oral argument. Oral argument will be held at a time and date to

be announced later.

F OR THE OURT August 31, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

[*] Circuit Judge Chen did not participate.

Case Details

Case Name: Nantkwest, Inc. v. Matal
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Date Published: Aug 31, 2017
Citation: 869 F.3d 1327
Docket Number: 2016-1794
Court Abbreviation: Fed. Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.