History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Antonio McNeely
696 F. App'x 659
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Antonio McNeely, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin M. Block, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Debra Lynn Dwyer, Assistant United States Attorney, Michael Clayton Hanlon, Assistant United States Attorney, Christopher M. Mason, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Antonio McNeely appeals the district court’s order granting reconsideration of the court’s prior order denying McNeely’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion and reducing McNeely’s sentence pursuant to Amendment 782 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual. [*] We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. McNeely , No. 1:11-cr-00114-CCB-21 (D. Md. Mar. 23, 2017). We deny McNeely’s motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

[*] Although the district court ultimately granted McNeely’s § 3582(c)(2) motion, the reduction granted by the court did not reduce McNeely’s sentence to the full extent he requested. 2

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Antonio McNeely
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Aug 29, 2017
Citation: 696 F. App'x 659
Docket Number: 17-6512
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.