History
  • No items yet
midpage
Carl McAdoo v. United States
17-1549
4th Cir.
Aug 28, 2017
Check Treatment
Docket

*1 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carl E. McAdoo, Appellant Pro Se. Gill Paul Beck, Sr., Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina; Sean Francis Perrin, WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina; John E. Rogers, II, WARD LAW FIRM, PA, Spartanburg, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Carl E. McAdoo appeals from the district court’s orders granting the Defendants’ motions to dismiss his complaint alleging various civil rights violations related to the death and estate of his father. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McAdoo v. United States , No. 1:14-cv-00239-MOC-DLH (W.D.N.C. Aug. 12, 2015; Apr. 4, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case Details

Case Name: Carl McAdoo v. United States
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Aug 28, 2017
Docket Number: 17-1549
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.