History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cheryl Jones v. Sandra Gregory
696 F. App'x 647
4th Cir.
2017
Check Treatment
Docket

*1 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cheryl Jones, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Cheryl Jones appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint as barred by the statute of limitations. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Jones’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Jones has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc. , 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Cheryl Jones v. Sandra Gregory
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Aug 28, 2017
Citation: 696 F. App'x 647
Docket Number: 17-1617
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.