History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Monte Winston
696 F. App'x 655
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Monte Decarlos Winston, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, Stephen David Schiller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Monte Decarlos Winston appeals the district court’s order denying Winston’s postjudgment motion asking the court to audit his federal sentencing obligation. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Winston , No. 3:99-cr-00030-REP-1 (E.D. Va. Mar. 21, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Monte Winston
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Aug 28, 2017
Citation: 696 F. App'x 655
Docket Number: 17-6470
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.