History
  • No items yet
midpage
Richard Montgomery v. Joe Coakley
696 F. App'x 625
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before TRAXLER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Montgomery, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Richard Montgomery, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Montgomery’s motion to amend his informal brief, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Montgomery v. Coakley , No. 3:16-cv- 00056-GMG-MJA) (N.D. W. Va. Mar. 24, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Richard Montgomery v. Joe Coakley
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Aug 24, 2017
Citation: 696 F. App'x 625
Docket Number: 17-6451
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.