History
  • No items yet
midpage
Albert Burgess, Jr. v. John Elliott
696 F. App'x 125
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before KEENAN, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Albert Charles Burgess, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Tucker S. Player, PLAYER LAW FIRM, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina; Drew Hamilton Butler, RICHARDSON PLOWDEN, Charleston, South Carolina; Carmen Vaughn Ganjehsani, RICHARDSON PLOWDEN, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Albert Charles Burgess, Jr., appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing as barred by the statute of limitations his civil action for legal malpractice and tortious interference with contract and additionally dismissing his legal malpractice claim for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Burgess v. Elliott , No. 3:16-cv-03325-RBH (D.S.C. Apr. 27, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Albert Burgess, Jr. v. John Elliott
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Aug 22, 2017
Citation: 696 F. App'x 125
Docket Number: 17-6678
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.