History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Ricky Holloway
696 F. App'x 110
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before KEENAN, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ricky Lee Holloway, Appellant Pro Se. David Ira Salem, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ricky Lee Holloway appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for reduction in sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Holloway , No. 8:13-cr-00525-RWT-2 (D. Md. Feb. 24, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Ricky Holloway
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Aug 21, 2017
Citation: 696 F. App'x 110
Docket Number: 17-6395
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.