Case Information
*1 N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ REMBRANDT GAMING TECHNOLOGIES, LP, Plaintiff-Appellant v.
BOYD GAMING CORPORATION, WMS GAMING,
INC., LVGV, LLC, Defendants-Appellees NEW CASTLE CORP., RAMPARTS, INC., MANDALAY CORP., CIRCUS CIRCUS CASINOS, INC., VICTORIA PARTNERS, BELLAGIO, LLC, MGM GRAND HOTEL, LLC, THE MIRAGE CASINO-
HOTEL, NEW YORK-NEW YORK HOTEL & CASINO, LLC, ARIA RESORT & CASINO HOLDINGS, LLC, CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT OPERATING COMPANY, INC., Defendants ______________________ 2016-2249 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada in No. 2:12-cv-00775-MMD-GWF, Judge Miranda M. Du.
______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ *2 R ACHEL Z IMMERMAN S COBIE , Merchant & Gould P.C., Minneapolis, MN, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by R ACHEL C. H UGHEY , C HRISTOPHER C.
D AVIS , C HRISTOPHER J. S ORENSON , E MILY W ESSELS ; J EFFREY B LAKE , Atlanta, GA.
T IMOTHY C OLIN M EECE , Banner & Witcoff, Ltd., Chicago, IL, argued for defendants-appellees. Also repre- sented by C HRISTOPHER G ALFANO , M ICHAEL J OSEPH H ARRIS , A UDRA C AROL E IDEM H EINZE , B RYAN M EDLOCK , J R .; D AVID P. E NZMINGER , Winston & Strawn LLP, Menlo Park, CA; P ATRICK M ICHAEL M C C ARTHY , Howard & Howard Attorneys, PLLC, Ann Arbor, MI.
______________________
T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is O RDERED and A DJUDGED :
P ER C URIAM (N EWMAN , O’M ALLEY , and R EYNA , Circuit Judges ).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT August 21, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court
