History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Sherlock v. Grigsby
167 A.3d 551
| D.C. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
Case Information

*1 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 16-BG-1069

IN RE SHERLOCK V. GRIGSBY,

Respondent. Board Docket Nos. 14-BD-103, 14-BD-105, 14-BD-106 & 14-BD-107 Bar Registration No. 494432 DDNs: 2013-D064, 2013-

D439, 2013-D240, 2013-D100 BEFORE: Beckwith, Associate Judge; McLeese, Associate Judge; and Farrell, Senior Judge.

ORDER (FILED – August 17, 2017)

The Board on Professional Responsibility concluded that respondent engaged in intentional misappropriation and recommends that the respondent be disbarred. Neither respondent nor Bar Counsel has excepted to that conclusion and recommendation. We therefore accept the Board’s recommendation. D.C. Bar R. XI, § 9 (h)(2).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that respondent Sherlock V. Grigsby is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. For purposes of reinstatement, the period of disbarment will begin to run when Mr. Grigsby has filed an affidavit demonstrating full compliance with D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g). PER CURIAM

Case Details

Case Name: In re Sherlock v. Grigsby
Court Name: District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Date Published: Aug 17, 2017
Citation: 167 A.3d 551
Docket Number: 16-BG-1069
Court Abbreviation: D.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.