History
  • No items yet
midpage
Marina Austin v. Christopher Orman
695 F. App'x 337
| 9th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before: SCHROEDER, TASHIMA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Marina Austin appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional violations arising from injuries sustained while riding on a bus. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), Barren v. *2 Harrington , 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir.1998) (order), and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed the action because Austin failed to allege facts sufficient to show that defendants Orman and Lessmeier personally participated in the alleged rights deprivation. See Jones v. Williams , 297 F.3d 930, 934 (9th Cir. 2002) (liability under § 1983 requires personal participation by the defendant).

All pending motions and requests are denied.

AFFIRMED.

2 16-35269

[*] This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

[**] The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Case Details

Case Name: Marina Austin v. Christopher Orman
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Aug 16, 2017
Citation: 695 F. App'x 337
Docket Number: 16-35269
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.