History
  • No items yet
midpage
Alan Mackety v. Stephanie Hollembaek
695 F. App'x 60
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alan Andrew Mackety, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alan Andrew Mackety, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Mackety v. Hollembaek , No. 5:16- hc-02120-D (E.D.N.C. Mar. 28, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Alan Mackety v. Stephanie Hollembaek
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Aug 15, 2017
Citation: 695 F. App'x 60
Docket Number: 17-6488
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.